Pre-launch · First corridor: US→India
Use technology to reduce coordination—not human responsibility.
AI may help organize information, compare evidence to employer-defined criteria, and surface missing actions. People remain responsible for decisions.
AI may assist
Make the operating work easier to see.
- 01
Organize and summarize
Structure role information, candidate evidence, feedback, readiness items, and support cases.
- 02
Support comparison
Compare information against criteria the employer defined without inventing hidden scores.
- 03
Surface missing actions
Flag incomplete information, timing risks, or unresolved operating questions for a person to review.
Humans decide
Consequential decisions do not belong to a model.
- 01
Hiring
People decide who advances, who is rejected, who receives an offer, and what compensation is approved.
- 02
Employment
People make performance, discipline, transfer, and termination decisions.
- 03
Consent and correction
Technology must not bypass a candidate’s choice or hide a path to question and correct information.
Before use
Every AI-assisted workflow needs a review path.
- 01
Source-linked evidence
A reviewer should be able to see where important information came from.
- 02
Human alternative
Candidates and workers need a person to contact when an automated step is wrong or unsuitable.
- 03
Monitoring and shutdown
Sekai must be able to detect harmful behavior, stop the workflow, and preserve evidence for review.
Questions
The short version.
Will AI reject candidates?
No. The intended boundary keeps advance, rejection, offer, compensation, and employment decisions human-owned.
Is any AI hiring product live today?
No AI-assisted hiring capability is represented as live on this pre-launch site.
Start a conversation
Bring one role. We’ll start with the real operating questions.
Book a conversation, share the role in writing, or email the founder directly.
launch@getsekai.com